Sam Tanenhaus, editor of the N.Y. Times Book Review, says “Every fresh idea is usually rooted in an older one.”
It has always been my conviction that to understand design or usefully talk about it one must view it not as a collection of isolated objects, but rather as a trajectory through time. We have to look not just at the individual product qua artifact but also at its social, cultural and technological meaning played out over time along a pathway of evolving inquiry; in other words, longitudinally, epistemologically and critically. I view products of design as plot points along pathways of design transformation – as episodes in ever-unfolding stories.
Take the iPad as an example. No serious consideration of design today can ignore the iPad, if only because the iPad has at last unlocked the long-sought mass market for tablet computers, opened a new chapter in personal mobile computing, is rapidly penetrating education and healthcare and is a platform for over 60,000 apps and counting. Beyond that, if one presumes to discuss design and innovation seriously, the iPad is a perfect case for exploring questions of how does exceptional design come into being and what does it teach us about innovation.
The iPad is surely a marvel of innovation. But it is not sui generis burst forth full-born from the brow of Zeus (or in this case, the brow of Steve Jobs.) To understand how innovation actually happens, you have to know that the iPad is over 40 years old, not just in basic concept, but in almost every detail of functionality and user experience. You have to understand the position of the iPad in the context of the history of Human-Computer Interaction and the Graphical User Interface.
Here some of the slides I use to teach the forty-year long quest of which the iPad is the latest instantiation.
Continue reading “The iPad is 40 Years Old”
Who invented Artificial Intelligence? On January 20, 2011 you can hear AI pioneer and Turing Award recipient Edward Feigenbaum talk about why, when, where and how AI originated and has developed over the past fifty years to become ubiquitous and pervasive today.
I will be conducting an interview/conversation with Ed at Adobe Systems in San Francisco at 6:00PM. This will be the inaugural event of a series titled Inside Stories! – conversations with distinguished Bay Area pioneers in science, business, technology, the arts and humanities.
Here are links to the Carnegie Mellon Alumni Association newsletter page where you can sign up to attend and to the Facebook page which you might want to use to pass this announcement on to other interested friends.
Following is more detailed information on the event and a bio of Ed Feigenbaum.
Continue reading “Inside Artificial Intelligence!”
Trying to drink from a firehose! That is what it is like trying to keep up with the flood of organizations engaged in promoting, reporting on, recognizing or awarding Sustainability initiatives. Sustainability has evolved from a principled cause to a cultural meme to a global virtual industry, opportunistically appropriated to polemics, politics, and public relations. One yearns for a different term to signify: “A world that works better for everybody, economically, socially and environmentally.”
Notwithstanding the overcrowding (who knows, maybe the field needs to follow the classic trajectory of new markets: i.e; a fast rush of opportunists leading to a speculative spike followed by a crash and shakeout followed by long-term solid and, um, sustainable growth), a recent arrival to the cause that is worth supporting is The Katerva Challenge (full disclosure: I am a member of Katerva’s advisory group.)
The Katerva Challenge is an annual ranking by the Global Challenge Institute of the best sustainability efforts in the world. They use a network of thought leaders and experts to identify and rank programs based on the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Vision 2050 report. Winners are those organizations and individuals making the greatest strides towards a sustainable planet. Winners do not get cash prizes ala The X-Prize. They receive promotion and publicity for their projects.
An earlier version of Katerva was a curatorial model that invited teams of innovators to develop sustainability initiatives and submit them for Katerva awards. Katerva 2.0 is more of a crowd-sourcing model where a network of third party “spotters” recommend projects that they think are worthy of recognition. I am contacting knowledgeable people to request that you pass on notable innovation initiatives to Katerva.org.
Continue reading “The Katerva Challenge For Sustainability”
The Innovation Machine
The Organizational Structure of Innovation: How Toyota, Procter & Gamble , GE, 3M, IBM, Google, Microsoft, Sony, Hewlett-Packard, DuPont, Honeywell, Whirlpool and other best-of-class companies manage Fast Innovation
Adapted from Die Innovations-Maschine, 2008 by Dr. Rolf-Christian Wentz, Lecturer at the University of Hamburg, Germany, in Innovation Management and Marketing.
Dr. Wentz makes the important point that the emphasis in recent years on the process organization of innovation has overshadowed the crucial importance of the organizational structure of innovation management within enterprises admired as “Innovation Machines.” His book seeks to redress this imbalance. He proposes a very useful typology of seven successful structures for management and organization of Fast Innovation:
Continue reading “The Innovation Machine”
Now here is something cool from my alma mater, Carnegie Mellon University!
This is not an entirely original idea. Last year Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco featured a wall of live streaming conversations from chat rooms on the internet. But this is novel for being in an open public space. Random snippets of conversation take on an enigmatic quality when they show up unexpectedly at billboard scale.
PRESS RELEASE, May 13, 2010: Carnegie Mellon Professors Launch Billboard Featuring Overheard Conversations
PITTSBURGH—The long defunct billboard structure on top of the Waffle Shop building has been redesigned into a large, analog Twitter account, presenting overheard conversations from the restaurant and art space below. Instead of seeing a typical commercial advertisement, passers-by now see a set of custom-made letters with only the sky as the background, creating a live marquee that can change on demand. The concept is the brainchild of Carnegie Mellon University professors Jon Rubin, an associate professor of art, and Pablo Garcia, the Lucian and Rita Caste Chair and an assistant teaching professor of architecture.
See the full Press Release description here